AI Skills, Critical Thinking and Inclusive Pathways to Work: What the UK Must Do Next

Written By Andy Hyde

The UK’s expansion of free AI skills training for up to 10 million adults by 2030 is a landmark moment for national skills policy. It signals that AI competency is now considered foundational to modern work – not a luxury for tech elites. But as we think about how people learn and adapt to change, we can’t divorce digital capability from human capability. In particular, critical thinking — a hot topic in today’s schools across Europe — is essential for people to use AI meaningfully and equitably.

1. AI Skills for Everyone — Ambition Meets Reality

In early 2026, the UK government and industry partners expanded the AI Skills Boost initiative, offering free modules that help workers across sectors understand and apply AI tools in real work tasks — from business communication to data handling and problem solving. Published figures suggest early traction with over a million completions already and partnerships that extend access beyond traditional tech sectors into healthcare, logistics and public services.

This programme matters for equity because it reduces one of the biggest barriers to participation — cost and exclusivity — and positions digital skills as part of the broader workforce ecosystem, not just something for coders or specialists.

However, equipping people with technical skills is only one half of the picture. Without strong reasoning and judgement skills, even AI-fluent workers are left ill-prepared to navigate complex choice, ambiguity and ethical questions that AI raises.

2. The Missing Core: Critical Thinking in Schools

A recent analysis in TES reflects how critical thinking has quietly disappeared from many classrooms. It wasn’t removed by big policy decrees; it slipped away under pressures to prioritise predictable exam outcomes, coverage of content, and superficial correctness — skills that AI can already emulate or accelerate. When curricula and accountability systems favour performance on standardised tests over deep intellectual engagement, teachers naturally optimise for short-term results, not thinking that sticks.

Critical thinking — defined as the ability to analyse, evaluate and construct reasoned arguments — isn’t a discrete add-on. It’s foundational to:

  • Interpreting AI outputs critically rather than accepting them unthinkingly

  • Making judgement calls in ambiguous work situations

  • Understanding ethical implications and unintended consequences

Employers consistently list critical thinking as a top competency, yet formal education rarely assesses or develops it explicitly. This disconnect matters deeply for equity: learners without access to environments that foster reasoning — in school, clubs or informal settings — start at a disadvantage entering both AI training and the world of work.

3. Why Critical Thinking and AI Skills Must Be Integrated

Thinking about the future of work as AI versus humans is a false dichotomy. AI will automate routine tasks, but it cannot replicate thoughtful judgement, ethical reasoning or conceptual agility — the very skills that drive innovation, leadership and meaningful problem-solving. Critical thinking isn’t just an educational ideal; it’s a workforce essential.

Look at the broader evidence:

  • OECD frameworks emphasise reasoning, judgement and higher-order thinking as central to 21st-century skills.

  • Research links critical thinking to better decision-making and resilience in complex contexts.

To make the UK’s AI skills strategy more inclusive and impactful, we have to embed reasoning, judgement and analysis into the same learning pathways as digital literacy.

4. How We Can Embed Critical Thinking into Skills Pathways

A. Curriculum reform — Governments and qualification bodies should ensure critical thinking isn’t sidelined by assessment priorities. Integrating reasoning explicitly within literacy and STEM subjects would help develop thinking that transfers across domains.

B. Teacher development — As the TES analysis notes, many teachers lack sustained professional development opportunities to teach inference, argumentation and conceptual grappling. Investing in sustained CPD in these areas is essential for equitable outcomes.

C. Informal STEM and community spaces — Clubs, maker spaces and projects like RC racing offer low-stakes, high-agency environments for young people to practice open-ended problem solving, inquiry, and analytical thinking — exactly the kinds of dispositions that complement AI training.

D. Careers education and guidance — Career guidance must connect critical thinking with workplace realities, especially as jobs become more AI-augmented rather than simply AI-enabled.

5. Inclusion, Equity and the Future of Work

If the UK’s AI skills strategy fails to cultivate critical thinking alongside technical literacy, it risks creating a workforce that can use tools without shaping them, or worse, a system where advantaged learners receive the reasoning practice they need while others do not. Equity in AI isn’t just about access to courses — it’s about empowering every learner with the cognitive tools to navigate change, ask hard questions, and make decisions that matter.

AI training gives people access to tools. Critical thinking gives people agency over how they use them.

To make the UK’s AI skills strategy truly inclusive and future-ready, policy and pedagogy must cultivate thinking alongside doing — not just automatic fluency with tools, but thoughtful, ethical and creative use of them.

Andy Hyde
Previous

The Young People Missing Between the Headlines
Next

What Career Live: Why ‘I Don’t Know’ Might Be the Most Powerful Answer of All